Opponents of Gov. Mike DeWine’s COVID restrictions and shutdowns have dropped a federal lawsuit they filed last fall, asking for the removal of the state of emergency that was declared in March. But that doesn’t mean the end of the legal fight is over.
Attorney Robert Gargasz says the lawsuit was withdrawn due to a change in legal strategy.
“Strategically, the judge wanted things adjusted and we are going to adjust them for the judge and we are going to the court so it’s not over. The fight has only begun," Gargasz says.
Gargasz doesn't want to explain details of his new legal strategy, citing attorney-client privilege. But he says the new, soon to be filed lawsuit will prove DeWine’s actions are unconstitutional.
Some businesses say they were badly hurt when the state demanded they shut down last spring. And they say the continuing limitations that are still in place, including a statewide mask mandate, continue to hurt their businesses.
When issuing coronavirus closures and restrictions last year, DeWine said the constitution specifically grants him the authority to issue the state of emergency.
Since that time, Ohio lawmakers have been considering bills that would strip DeWine of some of those powers in the future. They've sent to DeWine a bill that would allow them to rescind states of emergency or health orders. DeWine says he'll veto it.
DeWine also says the bill, SB22, is unconstitutional, allowing a concurrent resolution by the General Assembly to terminate a State of Emergency
— Andy Chow (@andy_chow) March 11, 2021
DeWine says it also violates separation of powers
But the bill passed by veto-proof majorities in both the House and Senate.
Copyright 2021 The Statehouse News Bureau. To see more, visit The Statehouse News Bureau.
