© 2024 Ideastream Public Media

1375 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44115
(216) 916-6100 | (877) 399-3307

WKSU is a public media service licensed to Kent State University and operated by Ideastream Public Media.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
News
To contact us with news tips, story ideas or other related information, e-mail newsstaff@ideastream.org.

It's Still Unclear How Diesel Fuel Got Into That Rover Mud Spill

Across the river from the site of the April spill, along the Tuscarawas River. [Matt Richmond / ideastream]

The site of what’s alleged to be a two million gallon spill of drilling mud is now just a quiet spot along the towpath trail south of Canton. There’s remnants of the cleanup work across the Tuscarawas River – gray fencing snakes through the woods and a layer of what looks like wood chips covers a few acres of otherwise empty woods. A black tube hangs loosely over the river, held up by some metal wire and winches.

This is just a tiny stretch of the $4 billion Rover pipeline’s path. In total, it’s a 700-mile natural gas pipeline that passes through four states. But what happened here temporarily delayed the project and may change the way Ohio regulates interstate pipelines.

It’s been six months since the spill. The company is refusing orders from state regulators to pay a $2.3 million penalty, and the dispute between the company and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency goes even deeper.

“Rover is a true outlier for us," says Craig Butler, director of Ohio EPA.

“We think they're just a blatant disregard for our environmental laws. We think they were rushing to get the project put in. And the environmental consequences did not matter," says Butler.

Initially, the drilling mud, which is used to ease the path as a drill bit bores under sensitive areas like rivers and highways, was not considered a hazard. It was reported as a mixture of clay and water. As part of the cleanup, Rover disposed of it without much oversight. According to Butler, samples of the mud taken by EPA, at the time of the spill, were later found to contain diesel fuel.

This was a surprise to Matt Ramsey, the chief operating officer of Rover’s parent company, Energy Transfer Partners.

“As we made very clear, we do not know the source of the diesel in the drilling mud," said Ramsey, during an August call with investors. "There's been a lot of theories put out there about it but we absolutely do not know the source of it.”

In filings with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, his company argued that the diesel could have gotten there from machinery used in the cleanup. Or maybe sabotage by an opponent of the project. The company responded to requests for comment by referring to their public filings with FERC.

One thing is for sure – diesel fuel was never supposed to be in there. By the time it was found, the mud had been dumped in two nearby quarries, described by Rover in documents as abandoned.

“It ended up being pumped and hauled out of the wetland where they were told to remove it from and dumped in our backyard, unfortunately," says Canton Water Superintendent Tyler Converse.

One of the quarries Rover used to dump the mud is close to a water source for the City of Canton. So the water department closed off part of its wellfield there. Converse says they began pulling more water from another source, which caused discolored water in one neighborhood.

“Of course, that’s completely unacceptable to us and it’s unacceptable to our customers in that area as well," says Converse.

Rover did not provide daily records of the chemicals it added to the mud. So FERC is investigating how the diesel got there. An independent engineering company was also hired to look into the cause of the original spill. That report says if Rover released two million gallons of drilling mud – as Ohio EPA says – Rover would have spent three or four days pumping mud after the spill began.

Rover disputes this estimate saying it’s likely much less mud was released.

“And so yes it's an extraordinary circumstance that we find ourselves in," says Ohio EPA's Craig Butler. "More than anything we're really disappointed that they continue to not want to be good corporate partners in Ohio.”

Butler says his agency is changing the way it regulates pipelines now. Ohio EPA required more specific plans in case of a spill before approving another interstate pipeline - Nexus.

Matthew Richmond is a reporter/producer focused on criminal justice issues at Ideastream Public Media.